Frequently Asked Questions


With the advances in UV LED technology, the use of LED UV for curing in the printing process has become increasingly visible throughout the industry. UV LEDs have had to overcome a number of technical and economic obstacles that prevented wider commercial acceptance.

Fully air-cooled LED UV

With the launch of GEW’s fully aircooled LED UV curing system lamphead LA1 barriers to adoption have now been lowered further. The LA1 is built around the same proven cassette-based design as the E2C and LW1 lampheads. It is fully compatible with existing RHINO powered ArcLED systems without the need for external chillers, pipes or coolant or indeed any other modification.

Within an ArcLED system printers are able to operate full hybrid UV curing, working with both mercury arc and LED lamp technology on the same press.

Double production speed can be achieved with thick, heavily pigmented inks. The LEDs’ high intensity UV-A rays penetrate thick ink coats better for more consistent curing with improved adhesion, delivering faster speeds with silkscreen, laminating and flexo base white.
The decisive ingredient is the photoinitiator, the chemical component that responds to the particular wavelength of the UV light. For LED technology to deliver speed and full cure the inks have to be specially formulated with a photoinitiator that responds to the LEDs’ UV-A wavelength. Generally this means LEDs and arc lamps require different inks.
Over a 10-year period the electricity consumption of a typical mercury arc system is 2,005,000 kWh; the equivalent LED UV system would consume 950,000 kWh, a reduction of over 50%. In the UK at approx. 10p/kWh this represents a saving of £ 105,000.
(based on a 45cm 8-lamp system with chiller, 60% uptime, 2 shifts/day, 6 days/week)
LED UV lamps use lower voltage DC power. RHINO ArcLED hybrid power supplies from GEW automatically recognise the type of cassette and switch to the correct power, which means both LED UV lampheads and conventional mercury arc lamps can be used with one single power supply and operated with from the same touch control panel.
LED inks are not as widely available, so the choice may be limited. Varnishes, spot colours and special low migration ink formulations achieve a better cure with arc lamps. Protective coatings also benefit from arc lamp short wave UV as this achieves the best surface hardness. However, unsupported films, shrink sleeves and many delicate, heat-sensitive materials are safer to process with LED UV.
No, frequent on/off switching does not reduce the life of UV LEDs, to the contrary because during stand-by and off times LEDs do not run and consequently do not degrade.
Over the first 20,000 hours of life, a typical LED system will lose about 15-20% of its UV output. After 20,000 hours the LEDs will continue to work but output will degrade more quickly and the probability of LED failure increases. When a single LED fails, the user will not notice, as surrounding LEDs automatically increase in power to accommodate the loss. However, eventually, enough LEDs in a single area will fail and curing results will suffer. At this point, the user can either replace the failed LED module or choose to replace the whole array to maintain uniformity of output across the curing width.
The capital cost for LED UV is higher than for arc lamp UV but the running costs are significantly lower. Users will have to balance the initial investment against ongoing costs to determine the return on investment. GEW can provide power usage estimates for comparable arc and LED systems tailored to specific requirements. In the meantime the demand for arc lamps will continue as a low investment alternative for their proven technology and choice of widely available inks.
LED UV should be chosen based on three criteria: suitability for the process, availability of inks and the ability to achieve productivity gains. Talk to your local GEW representative about your particular application.